But that's exactly what leaves me confused. Why exactly are their copies of the original, whether photographs, scans, or whatever, copyrightable when there is exactly zero added intellectual content? --
I think (and this is pure conjecture), the photographs themselves are copyrighted. It'd be like you going to the streets of Washington DC and taking photographs of buildings. There's no copyright on the buildings, but your photographs are yours, and covered by copyright.
Kim Patrick Clow
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
