Hmm, that seems more plausible to me...though for the life of me I don't
know why the midi file should be any better.  But I suppose that the
midi playback engine in Finale may have timing issues or is just a very
good playback engine..even if its attempting to playback exactly the
same set of midi data that it would export to a midi file.

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:53:23 -0400, "David W. Fenton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 1 Oct 2006 at 11:30, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
> 
> > So, what is this thread really comparing?  I am
> > totally confused.
> 
> I thought it was comparing playback direct from Finale (via MIDI data 
> generated in real time by Finale) vs. playback from a MIDI file saved 
> by Finale. There has always been a difference between these two, with 
> the saved MIDI file sounding better (in my opinion) in all cases.
> 
> -- 
> David W. Fenton                    http://dfenton.com
> David Fenton Associates       http://dfenton.com/DFA/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
-----------------------------------------------------------------
                 |"Music is a manifestation of the human spirit
Steve Schow      | similar to a language.  If we do not want such
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | things to remain dead treasures, we must do our
www.bstage.com   | upmost to make the greatest number of people 
                 | understand their secrets" -- Zoltan Kodaly
-----------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to