My preference is to move the accidental slightly closer to the notehead, increase the spacing between the two notes slightly, and to end the line visibly (i.e. between staff lines), and at an angle so that it still points to the notehead. No idea whether this matches up to any convention, though. A quick glance at a couple of scores (Ravel and Ferneyhough) turns up all sorts of inconsistencies in both.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darcy James Argue > Sent: 25 February 2007 00:50 > To: finale@shsu.edu > Subject: [Finale] Straight line gliss to notes with accidentals > > > Hey all, > > When using the straight line gliss, I usually like to have the line > attach directly to the noteheads. But what if there's an intervening > accidental that gets in the way? What's your preferred solution in > this case? End the line before the accidental (although sometimes > spacing is very tight and this would cause the gliss line to almost > disappear)? Hide the "real" accidental and put it in as an > articulation above the note? Or just live with the collision? > > Cheers, > > - Darcy > ----- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Brooklyn, NY > > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
