Yes there is, but it doesn't always work. Cheers,
- DJA ----- WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org On 1 Oct 2012, at 2:52 PM, Michael Mathew <mmathew_musicp...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, everyone, > > Isn't there a chase capability/setting in the playback window? > > Michael > mmathew_musicp...@yahoo.com > http://www.musicengravers.com/cgi-bin/engravers.pl > http://oregonmts.com/mathew/ > > >> ________________________________ >> From: "christopher.sm...@videotron.ca" <christopher.sm...@videotron.ca> >> To: finale@shsu.edu >> Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 11:15 AM >> Subject: Re: [Finale] Transposition Exp. >> >> Darcy, they claim that expressions in 2012c now chase correctly if you start >> playback from the middle of the piece. Have you tested that to see if it >> fixed now or not? My simple tests all worked, but maybe you spank it harder >> than I do. >> >> Christopher >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Darcy James Argue <djar...@mac.com> >> Date: Monday, October 1, 2012 1:20 pm >> Subject: Re: [Finale] Transposition Exp. >> To: finale@shsu.edu >> >>> Hi Robert, >>> >>> Do you generally work with concert pitch scores? I seemed to >>> recall you normally work with transposed scores. In transposed >>> scores, you'll only ever see the octave-displaced clefs if you >>> have "Display in Concert Pitch" temporarily turned on (for, >>> e.g., note entry). But they don't show up in the printed score >>> or parts. >>> >>> I'm wary of your expression-based solution because I find, when >>> playing back from the middle of the score, expressions that come >>> before the playback point are not reliably caught by Finale. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> - DJA >>> ----- >>> WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1 Oct 2012, at 9:41 AM, Robert Patterson >>> <rob...@robertgpatterson.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Octave displaced clefs is certainly one way to do it. I find >>> them to be >>>> overly fussy and potentially not as clear as regular clefs. >>> One could >>>> change the glyph for the octave displaced clefs (and I have >>> tried this), >>>> but then you can't tell the octave-displaced from the regular, >>> so you could >>>> potentially have errors that cost time figuring out. >>>> >>>> Another approach I have not tried is applying score-only staff >>> styles to >>>> the instruments that I want to show in sounding pitch. It >>> seems like it >>>> might work. >>>> >>>> But really, the transposing expression works beautifully. You >>> can put them >>>> into the instrument change names. Then if you hear an >>> instrument playing >>>> back in the wrong octave, you know you have forgotten the >>> expression to the >>>> player for changing axes. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Steve Parker >>> <st...@pinkrat.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe I'm misunderstanding but if I make a concert score >>> (never by >>>>> choice..) I make liberal use of octave displaced clefs. >>>>> >>>>> Steve P. >>>>> >>>>> On 1 Oct 2012, at 04:50, Robert Patterson >>> <rob...@robertgpatterson.com>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I am writing a contrabassoon part in a C score. The way I >>> usually handle >>>>> C >>>>>> scores is that I label each transposing instrument "sounding >>> as written", >>>>>> but I do not so label octave transposing instruments. That >>> allows me to >>>>> not >>>>>> be fussy about them. >>>>>> >>>>>> But it puts me in a quandary for correct playback, and I had >>> thought>>> transposing expression would work. But I am finding >>> (at least sometimes) >>>>>> they don't transpose. Specifically, I have a bassoon/contra >>> doubling>> part. >>>>>> When the contra part starts I put a hidden "T-12" >>> transposing expression >>>>> in >>>>>> the score. It was actually working, but then it stopped, and >>> I have no >>>>> idea >>>>>> what changed. I certainly did not change anything on purpose. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone know why a transposing exp. might not transpose? Oddly >>>>> enough, >>>>>> my piccolo expressions are transposing. Go figure. The >>> options in the >>>>>> assignment dialogs for both contra and piccolo exps look the >>> same to me. >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Finale mailing list >>>>>> Finale@shsu.edu >>>>>> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Finale mailing list >>>>> Finale@shsu.edu >>>>> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Finale mailing list >>>> Finale@shsu.edu >>>> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Finale mailing list >>> Finale@shsu.edu >>> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >> _______________________________________________ >> Finale mailing list >> Finale@shsu.edu >> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
