On 9/17/2013 8:09 PM, Robert Patterson wrote: > The version of MuseScore that I tried out 2 years ago was nowhere near > Fin/Sib, but it has been and continues to be moving faster than any of > them. And I disagree that it is not innovative. It's just that the > innovations that are added seem to be the pet projects of those who are > willing to put in the time to implement them and may not be the innovations > you or I want. > FWIW, you can find the MuseScore road map here: http://musescore.org/en/developers-handbook/references/musescore-2.0-roadmap
Most of the development items are things that have been in Finale and Sibelius, of course. I don't see anything innovative there. It looks like they are doing nothing but reverse engineering the 20-year-old products. _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
