These are great ideas. A lot of people use Digital Performer for scoring as it has fairly good editing of notation and is a full blown DAW. http://www.motu.com/newsitems/marc-mann-on-dp-and-danny-elfman http://www.motu.com/newsitems/and-the-oscar-goes-to-michael-giacchino http://www.motu.com/newsitems/dario-marianelli-wins-oscar-for-best-music-original-score
And I believe Lord Of The Rings was scored using Digital Performer....... I sorta wish MOTU would have bought MakeMusic..... On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <bath...@maltedmedia.com> wrote: > On Wed, November 20, 2013 2:39 pm, Eric Dannewitz wrote: >> Audio editing.....not sure if that is a biggie. Finale does have, I think, >> the >> ability to include/record audio. But how many people actually use that? > > I'm not sure. I certainly do, and have for years. I have scores that include > electronic sections that need to show as waveforms, fx tracks, include synth > instrument versions, etc. It would be a great boon for scoring, say, to > include and EDIT sound effects and music right in-score -- think of Vegas, > with its music generator. The whole score could be built in place instead of > swapping out to an audio application, bringing it back, stretching or > shrinking, transposing, etc. > >> What I'd like to see is way way better midi/notation integration. I'm still >> amazed at the poor midi output Finale generates when I dump a score out of it >> and load it into Digital Performer or Logic. > > INTEGRATION with them, exactly, so that edits in Logic or Sonar would appear > in the Finale score, in the audio file, and multi-vice-versa. > > Dennis _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
