Hmm. I could have sworn that this one from John Witmer was the original post. 
But anyway, I would certainly welcome an easy solution, regardless. Especially 
involving multi-movement works with linked parts. But also single-page songs 
for a songbook.

Christopher


> On Dec 9, 2016, at 8:29 PM, John Witmer <wit...@nctv.com 
> <mailto:wit...@nctv.com>> wrote:
> 
> Robert,
> I need your advice. I'm in the process of completing a 200 song compendium 
> using Finale 2014.5  When it is finished, (I promised it would be ready 
> "early" in 2017), I'll need to merge the individual charts for a single 
> document. This is for the sole use of a retirement community, but they'll 
> need about 100 copies. I believe I have volunteers who will fund the 
> printing, but I need to get good copy. 
> 
> Now, is Finale 25 good enough to undertake this task, or should I finish it 
> with Finale 2014.5? Either way, I'm afraid it will be a real chore. If all 
> else fails, I'll have to print 200 separate charts and collate them. This 
> will be hard because I need to print most pages "back-to-back" to keep the 
> total size less than an unabridged dictionary.
> 
> Your advice would be gratefully appreciated.
> Chordially,
> John Witmer
> Clemson Downs Retirement Community.




> On Dec 13, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Robert Patterson <rob...@robertgpatterson.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Actually, I'm the OP. But the 200 individual files is not my use case. If
> had that one I would probably go the pdf processing route too.
> 
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Christopher Smith <
> christopher.sm...@videotron.ca> wrote:
> 
>> The OP has 200 individual songs to include in a book. That means 200
>> titles, 200 lyricist/composer fields to enter and position, and possibly
>> copyright info or text boxes with instructions.
>> 
>> The computer can put all the individual PDFs into one PDF file and number
>> them automatically, with no extra messing around with titles, etc. I’d
>> definitely go with combining PDFs. This is what the computer is for, for
>> sure.
>> 
>> Christopher
>> 
>> 
>>> On Tue Dec 13, at TuesdayDec 13 1:44 PM, Robert Patterson <
>> rob...@robertgpatterson.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> FWIW:
>>> 
>>> If you make sure that both (all) file you are merging have the exact same
>>> staff list and staff properties, then Score Merger works pretty well.
>> This
>>> is likely if all the files came from the same template. Otherwise it may
>>> take some messing with.
>>> 
>>> So far what I've found that it messes up is:
>>> 
>>> 1. Lyric text gets mangled, but if each file has different
>>> verse/chorus/section numbers, you can recover pretty well using tools in
>> my
>>> plugin set. (I've added a plugin to make changing lyric numbers really
>>> easy.)
>>> 2. Staff baselines don't get transferred. I've added a plugin to do that.
>>> (You'll have to manually set the doc-level baselines to match.)
>>> 3. Staff styles are transferred incorrectly. I had to remove and reapply
>>> them on the merged score.
>>> 4. You may have to mess with staff groups. I've added some functions to
>>> help with that. (But if the groups match in all files there does not
>> appear
>>> to be a problem.)
>>> 5. You may have to edit with multipage headers like page numbers and
>>> measure number regions.
>>> 
>>> Still, I've managed to do it with results I am happy with. ymmv
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:24 AM, Robert Patterson <
>>> rob...@robertgpatterson.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Because collating and processing are what computers are for. I'd rather
>>>> spend my time writing a program to massage the files than constantly
>>>> collating and processing by hand. Which is what I've done.
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Steve Parker <st...@pinkrat.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 12 Dec 2016, at 20:24, Robert Patterson <
>> rob...@robertgpatterson.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I refuse to do post processing with a pdf editor. I would be willing
>> to
>>>>>> simply combine pdf's output by Finale, but any further post-processing
>>>>> than
>>>>>> that is unacceptable to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not to start one… but why?
>>>>> I’ve always collated these kind of things outside Finale.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Steve P.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Finale mailing list
>>>>> Finale@shsu.edu
>>>>> https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>>>>> 
>>>>> To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
>>>>> finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Finale mailing list
>>> Finale@shsu.edu
>>> https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
>>> finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Finale mailing list
>> Finale@shsu.edu
>> https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
>> finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 
> To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
> finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu

Reply via email to