That's why there's the "renice" command, no?
renice doesn't renice children of whatever you're renicing, does it? It'd be a PITA to renice fink, the fink that fink spawns, 5 different "make" sub-children, the shells those makes run, and so on...
I still think this is a reasonable idea, and dead easy to implement... Is there any reason not to do it?
-- Benjamin Reed, a.k.a. RangerRick [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://ranger.befunk.com/
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
