On 2005-08-09, Clemence Magnien wrote: > when you say you have such a version of mutt, do you refer to the patched > version? Anyway, if I understand correctly that means you have a working > mutt.info file for one version or the other.
I've got an info file for mutt 1.5.9 that uses header caching. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/crhalpin/mutt-ssl.info?rev=1.1&view=auto > Do you think one of us should try and propose it as an official package > description? Or should we (I?) try and make all the four versions I > mentioned above before that? Well, I'm not sure what the point would really be of providing more than -ssl and non-ssl versions of mutt. If people don't want the header caching, then they can disable it in .muttrc. Or rather, they can not enable it. :-) > Or should we wait for an answer from the maintainer? I really don't > know what is the policy in this kind of situation. Typically if the maintainer is gone AWOL, someone else can adopt the package. I emailed the maintainer on 6/19/05, and have yet to get a response. Has anyone else on the list heard from Christian Swinehart recently? fink-core: if not, should we consider mutt orphaned? If so, I'd be willing to adopt it, provided nobody else wants it. crh
pgpN76xcAqfug.pgp
Description: PGP signature
