On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:12:33 -0800 Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I generally try to overestimate in deciding what packages go > into Depends. If I see something only looks like it *might* be a > dependency, I go ahead and add it. Better to have too many > dependencies than too few. I disagree respectfully. I have in the past avoided (trying out) many packages because the Dep list was unreasonably long. I tend to be minimalist, not the safest approach undoutedly, but it is worth it in the long run IMHO. Indirect dependencies in particular can be difficult to track down but will save a huge amount of compile time to users. Best Regards, Rogue PS: dependencies, isn't that what otool -L is for? ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
