On 3/7/07, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: > > > Peter O'Gorman wrote: > >> On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Blair Zajac wrote: > >>> 1) Would the Python maintainers be willing to take patches for a > >>> framework install? > >> I'd make a new package and ensure that it does not have any > >> conflicting files with any fink python packages. There then does > >> not need to be any interaction with the current python > >> maintainers. Although Apple puts symlinks from the framework back > >> into /usr/lib etc, it is not necessary for fink to do so. This > >> will allow you to customize the python framework build as > >> necessary for your PyQt apps. > > > > And presumably we can have this new Python still reference Python > > modules for the non-Framework build, as this would be ideal??? If > > not, then we could add a new Type: > > > > Type: > > Type: python (2.4 2.4-framework 2.5 2.5-framework) > > The maintainer can choose what paths to search etc. But, if I were > the maintainer, I'd do both. Have a specific path for your framework > python that is searched before the other fink paths. > Then you can have modules that require macpython in your 2.5- > framework type and still leverage the normal 2.5 modules. Modules in > the framework dir will be found first, so you can actually have the > cake and eat it too.
Peter, In that case, would you want python2.4-framework to provide a virtual python2.4? -- - Charles Lepple ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
