Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: > >> Peter O'Gorman wrote: >>> On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Blair Zajac wrote: >>>> 1) Would the Python maintainers be willing to take patches for a >>>> framework install? >>> I'd make a new package and ensure that it does not have any >>> conflicting files with any fink python packages. There then does not >>> need to be any interaction with the current python maintainers. >>> Although Apple puts symlinks from the framework back into /usr/lib >>> etc, it is not necessary for fink to do so. This will allow you to >>> customize the python framework build as necessary for your PyQt apps. >> >> And presumably we can have this new Python still reference Python >> modules for the non-Framework build, as this would be ideal??? If >> not, then we could add a new Type: >> >> Type: >> Type: python (2.4 2.4-framework 2.5 2.5-framework) > > The maintainer can choose what paths to search etc. But, if I were the > maintainer, I'd do both. Have a specific path for your framework python > that is searched before the other fink paths. > Then you can have modules that require macpython in your 2.5-framework > type and still leverage the normal 2.5 modules. Modules in the framework > dir will be found first, so you can actually have the cake and eat it too. > > Peter
Good idea. The only other thing then would be to have a python2.5-bin and a python2.5-framework-bin that provides the symlinks for python to python2.5 or python2.5-framework binaries. Blair ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
