-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Remi Mommsen wrote:
> I guess this would be possible with a lot of hacking and testing > (possibly repeating each time when a new version is released). In > addition, I would need to maintain 8 different info files instead of > one. I hope we can find a better solution as this solution is (too) > time consuming IMHO. I think it makes more sense to have variants in shlibs in some form, it will take some time to do right though. In the meantime, it's safe to ignore those specific errors in validation for the sake of getting the package out, I think, but ultimately we need a way to: a) ignore "private" shared libs that have no public API/headers b) handle differences in builds with virtual packages -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGP5N7Uu+jZtP2Zf4RArNtAJ9c9nnmpBzl1zRcgCVt2NPg3jsoTACfbmTY fDHeHiUZStXB/EmUA4xGQzM= =Ik3Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
