Hi Martin, On May 7, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Benjamin Reed wrote: > [] >> a) ignore "private" shared libs that have no public API/headers > > In the case of root5, aren't all dylibs private, or is there > another package depending on one of them? I would just scrap the > whole shlibs splitoff stuff for this package. It isn't worth the > hassle. There is no (official) fink package depending on it. Most high energy physics experiments (and others) using root to build their specific applications against it. Thus it could be that somewhere somebody relies on the fact that shlibs of older root version can be kept in parallel to newer ones. I'm not aware of anybody who started packaging the experiment specific code into fink package(s), thought. I guess it wouldn't be too difficult to extend the variant syntax to the Shlibs field. Is there any show-stopper/stumbling block which I'm not aware of? Remi -- If it's green, it's biology. If it stinks, it's chemistry. If it has numbers, it's math. If it doesn't work, it's technology. (anonymous) ********************************************************************* Remigius K. Mommsen e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Manchester URL: http://cern.ch/mommsen Fermilab, MS 357 voice: ++1 (630) 840-8321 P.O. Box 500 fax: ++1 (630) 840-2649 Batavia, Il 60510, US home: ++1 (630) 236-0932 ********************************************************************* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
