On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:19:47PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 3/19/10 11:42 AM, Vincent Beffara wrote:
> > 
> > - about the package name. I would be tempted to simply use 'ipe' with 
> >   version 7.0.10 but 'ipe7' is an option as well, which would match the 
> >   previous one. What is the policy on that, if there is one ?
> > 
> 
> The original package is named 'ipe6' because it builds shared libraries
> as well (ipe6-shlibs).  I'd recommend making the library package
> ipe7-shlibs for consistency, but you're welcome to call the main package
> "ipe".

More critically, what is the install_name of the library? If it is
still libipe.1.dylib (same as ipe6) then package-name remains the
same. If it changes, package-name must change. No clue why ipe_6_ was
chosen for _1_.dylib, but now we're stuck with that for it, and you
can make your own choice about what new package-name to use if that
filename will be different.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[email protected]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to