On 7/26/12 8:01 AM, David Lowe wrote: > On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:18 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> The current test rules that a machine is 64-bit capable if one of those >> is set. > > I get these results on 10.6.8: > > Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (228) $ sysctl hw.optional.x86_64 > hw.optional.x86_64: 0 > Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (229) $ sysctl hw.optional.64bitops > second level name optional in hw.optional.64bitops is invalid > Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (230) $ sysctl hw.cpu64bit_capable > hw.cpu64bit_capable: 0 > > Did the middle result confuse things? > > Sent from Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini > > I'll get you, my pretty, and your little dog, too! >
What _really_ happens is that that the test uses 'sysctl -a' to get all of the available fields, checks to see if one of those 3 fields is present, and compares its value to the string "1". But after careful checking, I think I've found the problem. It looks like the bootstrap script isn't doing things differently for 32-bit-only Intel machines on 10.5/10.6 like it should. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
