I'm sure about the policy really. And it might not have been
xfree86-system, I'm compiling qt 3.0.2 right now and don't want to use
extra cpu time :P But altimetly max will have final say on weather this
is useful or not. Though i do believe there is a high enough demand for
it :P. it does do verions and revisions as well...if you apply the patch
(you must be running current cvs with the splitoff codes, and do a fink
info <pkg>-<version>-<revision> it will find it and tell you the tree. if
it's both or all three tree it will default to the first tree it's in in
your fink.conf.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Well... According to policy, if there's a package in stable, shouldn't
>there
>be the same or updated package in unstable? (Unless the package name has
>changed, or has been removed from the unstable distro.)
>
>If you're talking about system-xfree86, it's in unstable as well, but
>they're just the same revisions. (That might be something to add to the
>patch, too, whether the revisions in unstable and stable are the same...)
�.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
