I agree we could use a binary unstable distribution like Debian. Any chance we could merge back with Debian and leverage their auto-build and mirror mechanisms? They have a few fledgling efforts on their web page for other kernels (GNU Hurd, FreeBSD, NetBSD). It would eliminate the periodic build errors when maintainer X moves his tarball.
One thing that can help is to use ccache (available in unstable tree). It caches .o files based on MD5SUM of preprocessor output. It won't help the first time you run it, but my performance appears to be steadily increasing. [tinman:~] bschott% ccache -s cache hit 4208 cache miss 11503 called for link 1018 multiple source files 80 compile failed 385 ccache internal error 7 preprocessor error 43 not a C/C++ file 587 autoconf compile/link 5780 unsupported compiler option 6 no input file 320 files in cache 23006 cache size 291.8 Mbytes [tinman:~] bschott% On 9/17/02 9:12 PM, "Rogério Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 17 2002, NDPTAL85 wrote: >> On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 07:36 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: >>> Seems to be there now (in the 10.2 tree). >> >> I'm still on 10.1.5 for the forseable future. Will there be one for >> 10.1.5 too? > > As I'm still going to use 10.1.5 for the foreseeable future > too and compiling packages in my iBook with little memory is > quite demanding, I am interested to know what the future plans > of the Fink project are. > > For instance, when will a next binary release be available? No > exact dates are needed, of course -- just a rough idea is > enough. > > Will the next (binary) version of Fink be meant to be run on > MacOS X 10.1 or is the focus changing to Jaguar? > > Also, are there plans on establishing a security update > infra-structure for the stable release, like what Debian does? > (Perhaps via a "new" distribution, available via apt). > > I ask this last question because I see that some programs > available in the binary distribution have security problems > and updates for them would be necessary. > > > Thanks for any help, Roger... > > P.S.: I sincerely hope that new binary packages are generated. This > would cut a lot of the traffic we see on this mailing list of people > trying to use Fink's unstable distribution. _____________________________________________________________ Brian Schott, Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] USC Information Sciences Institute ph:703-812-3722 3811 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 200 fx:703-812-3712 Arlington, VA 22203 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users