Martin Costabel wrote: > I guess pogma needs to add another patch for autoconf-2.64. > Or Fink needs to go back to autoconf-2.63. >
Well, gcc requires the use of specific, non-vendor patched versions of the autotools, the version of autoconf currently required is 2.59. Using any other version to autoreconf gcc is problematic. Ralf, Paolo etc are working on updating gcc's autoconf to 2.64 for gcc-4.5.x. Still, I hope that the use of undocumented m4 sugar and autoconf macros in the wild is minimal. I am still willing to revert the autoconf package to 2.63 and increment the epoch, I am not willing to patch autoconf to keep previous behaviour for m4_copy and m4_rename just for the gcc42 package though. Martin, in your opinion is the new autoconf package too incompatible to keep being named 'autoconf'? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
