On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 02:02:46PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > It looks like somehow the removal of the gcc43 package didn't > occur when you tried to build gcc44. The following... > > Conflicts: gcc4, gcc42, gcc44, gcc45 > Replaces: gcc4, gcc42, gcc44, gcc45 > > has always been sufficient to cause the other conflicting > gcc4X packages to be removed during the build of a specific > gcc4X package. I haven't seen this myself. Hopefully fink > hasn't been changed to require an explicit BuildConflicts > as well.
Fink has never acted as "foo:Conflicts:bar means remove bar before building foo". Conflicts and Depends are not perfectly symmetric (and nothing has changed in many years in the effect of either of them). dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
