{#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{#} To reply to the author, write to Zachery Bir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 05:06 , Matthew Stuckwisch wrote:
> *This was sarcasm intended to enforce the idea that no interface
> is perfect, and even ineffective interfaces can have the qualities
> of what people see in effective interfaces. IRC in a CLI is
> difficult to follow when there are multiple conversations (partly
> because IRC is based on group chats) going on at one time, but it
> also at the same time has all the qualities that people have been
> asking for, but I seriously doubt that anyone really wants a
> return to an interface like that, unless they're CLI junkies ;)
Alas, some of us are. If I could find a decent Jabber client that
worked half as well as micq, I'd be so there, baby.
I tend to go on complete waffling jags between love of my
anti-aliased, translucent, lovely ( now no longer ) Aqua interface,
and pure love of clean, crisp console fonts running nothing but
terminal apps... *sigh*
Zac
{#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
