Den 2011-12-31 15:08 skrev Dmitry Yemanov såhär:
> 31.12.2011 17:57, Alexander Peshkov wrote:
>
>> This will make each version of the record (not the record- but EACH
>> version of it) 4 bytes longer.
> Not strictly necessary. We could use a variable-length encoding for txn
> ids longer than 32 bits and mark such records with a new flag. It would
> add zero storage/performance overhead for all the current applications
> but allow longer txn ids for the slightly bigger cost. It would increase
> the code complexity though.

Are there unused flag bits available in the current record format, that 
could be used for this purpose? Or how are such flag bits encoded?

Kjell

-- 
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
DataDIA AB
E-post: kj...@datadia.se
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to