On 29-7-2014 13:46, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > On 07/28/14 20:12, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> On 28/07/2014 12:54, Tom Coleman wrote: >>> Every young developer knows Java and JDBC, >> Young developer should stay far from C++. > > Yes and know. Not sure about South America, but in Russia (I did not > check myself, but trust people who said it) average firebird user > becomes older and older. If we have a chance to attract younger people > we should better not miss it. I do not suggest to use JDBC as main API - > I prefer even not try to imagine > >> need to call get(1..n) virtual calls for each record in > > at least yvalve. But adding JDBC at the top of calls makes no danger - > one who prefers JDBC will be able to use it. And such change may be done > at almost any moment - our master interface can be easily extended with > new call to access jdbc interface. When I have time I can take a look at > how much job is needed to bring vulcan code to jdbc standard. It should > start to work almost at once - it's based on ISC API which is still > present (and probably will be present) for a long time.
In this discussion, could we use the phrase JDBC-like instead, as I assume that we are not talking about adopting Jaybird as the main Firebird API and telling all other languages "well good luck with talking to Java". I think use of the term JDBC in this context is confusing. Mark -- Mark Rotteveel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
