On 22-03-2015 11:23, Jim Starkey wrote: > Adriano, it perpetually amazes me that somebody with such a keen sense of > database design doesn't dazzle the world with a brilliant new database rather > than continuously harping about the design of a 30 year old retread database > system. > >> On Mar 21, 2015, at 6:46 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes >> <adrian...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >> DPB is wrong in all sense. >> >> It's very cheap to parse, but nobody needs to live with its all >> disadvantages in a much cost (attachment) process. >> >> It's binary, every connection layer must support it. We do not talk >> about hardcoded constants in applications only. >> >> There is database tools, application servers, etc. >> >> And if you think in pluggable multi-provider, every connection layer >> must know every constant of every provider and every new versions of >> them. Or let people edit binary strings in files. > (This is, of course, completely wrong, but more about this later.) >> >> Connection parameters should be in text form. >
Someone following this or not just registered a ticket: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4716 I'm so sorry for Delphi people, so sorry... Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
