24.03.2017 17:12, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: ...
> Looks like you do not understand how it works. Re-read thread "Adding > NOT NULL fields with DEFAULT" from 2009. That thread contains more details, thanks for recall it. >>> Correct result is priority, and current implementation detail does it >>> very well >> >> So far we have no agreement on what is "correct result". > > And have no one agreeing with you so far. You would be wondered but i discussed it with Dmitry before create a ticket. >> Current implementation >> changed well known old behaviour not claiming it as a bug. I'd say it looks >> like >> a bug itself. >> > > Changed a bugged design/implementation since 2009. Looks a bit late to > say this. It is never late to fix something if it is wrong. And to add some docs to avoid such conversations in the future. Vlad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
