On 05/06/2018 07:34, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > > Maybe it is just me, but it seems we are now having discussions that > should have been had and resolved before implementation. > You, as a waterfall methodology advocate, can pretend it's not implemented, so let's say we're still building the 1000 pages document describing the feature without ever put a line of code.
> And I repeat again, that I think that this feature should not land in > Firebird 4, and needs to be delayed to Firebird 5. > Really it can't, it's that vaporware. No way to release that document we didn't even passed for a code guy implement. Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
