On 05/06/18 16:27, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Maybe it is just me, but it seems we are now having discussions that
should have been had and resolved before implementation.

In my whole life, I only see things being done when someone *really
does* it.

That discussion you were talking, before implementation, if nobody
implemented it, it would now be on one of two extremes: silent or that
b*t, does not work in another calendar, does not work outside earth,
does not work in my application if I do not change it...

But really test the implemented version, nobody does...

Or simply carry on using UTC timestamps exactly as they currently are and manage timezone display using external tools which DO respect at least some of the edge cases.

I do not recall seeing any discussion on the ground rules for handling timezone offsets prior to an implementation being proposed? It could then have been pointed out that the SQL rules simply don't work in a lot of cases. The idea of listing the end time assumes that there will only ever be 4 decimal places of second accuracy, but the involves cropping current time systems. Avoiding the problem makes a lot more sense.

Guide lines created in RFC7808 address the majority of the problems created by poorly thought out 'standards' like that included in the SQL book. That RFC provides a clear set of rules to handle the very things that are being reinvented currently ... and any timezone management package should at least be capable of the same level of accuracy.

--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to