On 20/09/2019 09:29, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote: > On 18.09.2019 4:13, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > >> In API, but I'm not completely satisfied with solutions as they were >> done related to above problems. >> >> Preferable settings should be done on statement basis, > > We have a problem with that approach. Cursor may be opened not only > using prepared statement but also directly from attachment. How can we > control data returned by such cursors? >
It's the same. Cursors via not prepared statement may have flags related to flags used in statement preparation. >> or external >> engines must be somewhat treated as another attachment from this POV. > > I think that from end-users POV that will be the best solution. But is > it hard to distinguish at attachment level were we invoked from > external engine or by regular client? > It's important to not just distinguish between client x external engine attachment. Each external engine should be a completely independent attachment, as each may have be made in a different technology. Adriano Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
