Mariuz and Werner, thanks for your responses!! I'll check your links.
Merry Christmas to all! Saludos / Best regards Mario Lacunza Email:: [email protected] Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/ OpenOffice.org:: http://es.openoffice.org/ OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffice-peru.com/ Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/ Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/ Google Talk: mlacunzav Skype: mlacunzav MSN: [email protected] Y! messenger: mlacunzav El jue 22 dic 2011 05:56:13 PET, werner escribió: > Hi Mario, > > On 12/22/2011 10:17 AM, mariuz wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:54:08AM -0500, Mario Lacunza wrote: >> > Hello Mariuz, >> > Im corious for what reasons you think GIT is better? I work with SVN >> > most of my projects but I want test GIT, so will be very appreciated >> > your comments. >> >> Some of the arguments are presented here (yes even php is switching >> to git from an cvs->svn transition (they have lost a lot of time with >> svn migration and now finally doing the right thing)) >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dvcs >> And more http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/ >> >> And you can see other projects that are using git >> http://git-scm.com/ >> > I have switched over from CVS to SVN years ago and earlier this year I > switched to hg (only reason is that the project I needed to work on > was on hg) and for my little projects it is absolutely great. > > With DVCS you have much more flexibility, branching, sub-repo, clone, > merge are I think a lot better then what SVN offers. > > Here some more links to read. > http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis > http://hginit.com/ > http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/ > > I would experiment with both hg and git and see which fits best for > your way of working, I am pretty sure that either of them are better > for you then SVN. > > Werner > >
