Rako, further obfuscation of JS code will never be a feature of Firebug. Most minimized JS is already quite obfuscated and, if anything, we'll produce a mechanism to display it more legibly, either by extension or with a feature.
As for the Off vs [X] button, I really feel this was a bit of a wasted effort and a discussion that blew the issue out of proportion. Now we've implemented this change to appease a noisy few. Most users will learn that the [X] button means "Close / Off" after they've used it. It behaves similarly to how you'd expect a close button to work in any other area of Firefox or the OS. I, for one, will be glad to see the "Off" label go away as soon as possible. On Jul 7, 3:33 pm, Rako <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not rant. > I simply explain why is this extension/modification to/of the > activation needed. > Perhaps my reasoning offends you (are you one of the reverse- > engineers?), but it is not going to change my reasoning. > > On Jul 7, 12:34 pm, alfonsoml <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jul 7, 8:32 am, Rako <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I agree with all you say, but what annoys me, are the requests for new > > > features in FB to enable reverse engineering. > > > Then place your rants in those threads. > > This is already too heated, please, don't mix unrelated things. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
