> Despite what Steven is claiming here, I doubt that the vast majority > of Firebug users who also happen to be developers create brand new > profiles and go through the hassle of switching profiles every time > they want to do some debugging, and then go through the hassle again > every time they want to do some casual browsing.
???? All that to avoid having two windows open? You can have multiple profiles open at the same time, you know... so it would be the awful painful process of switching windows. Yikes! I'm guessing you shut down Firefox in order to run a different version of Firefox, rather than having both versions running at the same time. Or resort to the portable versions. > I still would like support for my use case... You know, I think there is room here for a company to come in and create supported versions of firebug for a fee, and that might be what the two developers that work it have in mind as they try and trim and clean the core code and make more of Firebug customizable from extensions. > The closer Firebug can act to 1.2, the better. IMO. Firebug 1.2 was terribly broken for most people. Not you, obviously. Not for me either. Yet our experience doesn't trump theirs. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
