> I *do* think it's irresponsible to tell people that they can port-scan any >machine or network they like with impunity. Even if you believe (for even >the most compelling reasons) that this *should* be true, I don't believe that >it *is*. What law is broken by doing so? Who says I can run a port scan against *.*.*.* anytime I like? As far as I'm concerned, this is just another normal and proper part of the traffic flowing on the net... - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: trial & charges getchell
- Re: trial & charges Paul D. Robertson
- Re: trial & charges Ron DuFresne
- Re: trial & charges Paul D. Robertson
- Re: trial & charges Ron DuFresne
- Re: trial & charges getchell
- Re: trial & charges Dave Gillett
- Re: trial & charges Derek Martin
- Re: trial & charges Paul Howell
- RE: trial & charges Randall, Mark
- RE: trial & charges Randall, Mark
- RE: trial & charges Randall, Mark
- RE: trial & charges Dave Gillett
- RE: trial & charges Randall, Mark
- RE: trial & charges Randall, Mark
- RE: trial & charges Randall, Mark
- RE: trial & charges stbrow - Stacy Brown
- Re: trial & charges Gene Lee
- Re: trial & charges getchell
- Re: trial & charges Gene Lee
- Re: trial & charges (off topic) getchell
