Re: LINUX Vs NT

[Justin]

but they look like crap and you can't read them at all. Any idea what i can do to make it more readable.

"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:

On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 12:39:20PM -0500, Justin Strittmatter wrote:
> A little off the subject but I was wondering if there was an ipchains quick
> reference card out there at all that i can download from somewhere

        You might want to check up at the IPChains home page:

        http://www.rustcorp.com/linux/ipchains/

        There's a remark there that says a reference card is in the source
tarball.

        My guess is that it's this file...  :-)

        ipchains-1.3.9/ipchains-quickref.ps

> Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Dave Laird wrote:
> >
> > > Good morning,
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: MUDLA MADA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 6:02 AM
> > > Subject: LINUX Vs NT
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > A little of topic i no but does anyone have any comments or problems
> > > with either of the above >mentioned os's
> > >
> > > > As my current project require a secure system and I think linux is
> > > best
> > > > if correctly configured but some say NT
> > > >
> > > > Any takers
> > >
> > > What a lovely can of worms you have there. 8-)
> >
> > And, some prefer BSD/OS.
> >
> > > I do know that the super-spooks of this industry, the Department of
> > > Defense, once rested their entire case on NT, but in recent years have
> > > put nearly their entire array of NT servers behind Linux boxes running
> > > either secure shell <ssh> or tcpd wrappers using highly-customized
> > > kernel adaptations. This endeavor, done at the Bremerton naval
> > > facilities in Bremerton, Washington.
> >
> > This is, perhaps, a distinct approach for the Bremerton Naval Facility.
> > The approach to security in DoD is extremely varied ranging from locations
> > that simply do not satisfy the basic DoD InfoSEC directives to those that
> > are fully-compliant with all DoD InfoSEC directives and the extensions
> > that are applicable to their branch of the armed services.
> >
> > A lot depends on the general sensitivity of the information available at
> > the location or the classification level of the activities of the major
> > tenant of the location.  Locations with tenants involved in the DoDIIS
> > Community tend to be more secure than other locations and tend to use
> > Unix-based solutions rather than Linux or NT -based solutions.
> >
> > What I consider to be one of the more secure Naval facilities uses BSD/OS
> > systems to implement their network and information security policies.  I'm
> > biased.  I am the architect of the solution and until relatively recently
> > have worked exclusively in the DoDIIS Community.
> >
> > Merton Campbell Crockett
> >
> > -
> > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

--
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 331-2437   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!