Right you are, but perhaps the issue is bandwidth in this case. Ciao, Marko. mouss wrote: > > Thanks Marko, > > so these are POST commands using specific URLs. so as you suggested, one > can simply > block these URLs. However, this won't block new ones. > > Anyway, I don't see why the guy wan't to block attachments? if it is > because of viruses and the like, > he can simply filter http traffic withan antivirus product (and here there > are many solutions, > including *sweeper). > > regards, > mouss > - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Denying attachments for web based email Ben Keepper
- RE: Denying attachments for web based email Mark Eastoe
- Re: Denying attachments for web based email Chris Francosky
- RE: Denying attachments for web based email Graham, Randy \(RAW\)
- RE: Denying attachments for web based email Chris Francosky
- RE: Denying attachments for web based emai... mouss
- Re: Denying attachments for web based ... Marko Vukovic'
- Re: Denying attachments for web ba... mouss
- Re: Denying attachments for w... Marko Vukovic'
- Re: Denying attachments for web ba... Ron DuFresne
- Re: Denying attachments for w... mouss
- delivery failure reports ... mouss
- ADMIN: Re: delivery f... Bryan Stansell
- Re: Denying attachments f... Ron DuFresne
- Re: Denying attachmen... Marko Vukovic'
- RE: Denying attachments for web based ... Ron DuFresne
- RE: Denying attachments for web based email Mark Eastoe
- RE: Denying attachments for web based email Hudak, Tyler
