"Laura A. Robinson" wrote:
>
> How familiar are you with MS Proxy? It wasn't a firewall
I'm willing to bet real money that the majority of the MS proxy
users used MS proxy as their only layer of defense.
> and wasn't marketed as a firewall.
I could care less what the spin doctors of _any_ company
decide to (not) market something as.
> When did Microsoft submit MS Proxy for ICSA certification?
When did this become a requisite for calling something a firewall?
(No, I _know_ you didn't say that it was. I'm simply stating that
it's an invalid point.)
> Do you people ever actually have constructive discussions, or is
> there some point in playing pedantic semantics all day?
This from someone who opened up her discussion in a thread by
pointing out typos. And obstructing an otherwise constructive
discussion by flaming people and making a big point of the
vast semantial differences between MS proxy and ISA server.
> ISA is not MS Proxy. How much clearer do I have to be?
The name is apparently different, and ISA server has more
features. And windows 95 isn't windows 3.11+win32s with a new
program manager, released three years later... or... wait..
--
Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB
Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 �RNSK�LDSVIK, Sweden
Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05
Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
