Hey, Einstein, I said "Windows 2000 server as a router/firewall", not "ISA running on Windows 2000 as a firewall". I also later posted that I was specifically NOT referring to ISA before some nit assumed that I was, although that post hasn't hit the list. Guess I found my first nit. I'll even include the text below.
"Reply-To: "Laura A. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Laura A. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <snipped for privacy> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Users slam Microsoft Security Analyser Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:37:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > And if I had been the one teaching that course, I'd have stated flat-out > that if you were even *contemplating* using a Windows 2000 box as a router, > you were out of your mind. It's neither financially nor technologically sane > to do so. Note that I'm referring to a vanilla Win2K box, not an ISA box. :-) Laura" Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mikael Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Laura A. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:53 PM Subject: Re: Replacing my old PIX Classic > > Hmmm. > > "Laura A. Robinson" wrote: > > > > ISA *is* a firewall. > > > On Apr 15 2002 9:47PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted to focus-ms: > > in my courses, we discuss *real* router and firewall solutions and > > ignore the parts of the labs that imply that one would actually use > > a Windows 2000 server as a router/firewall > _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
