> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikael Olsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 13-16
> To: Alex Kvasnytskyy
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cyberwall Plus/Host based Firewall
>
>
>
> Alex Kvasnytskyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [cyberwall plus]
> > uderstand Micro$oft RPC, so you can solve a lot of problem
> > with Exchange/OWA.
>
> Hm, this one sort of tickled my debate nerve...
>
> Does it "understand" dce-epmap insofar that it can punch open
> a lot of holes, or is it actually able to pass it securely,
Allow communication only through port # from second packet in RPC
communication, at least I can not use any other for establishing connection
:(
> without adding _new_ holes that result from the dce-epmap support?
>
>
> /Mike, curious
>
> --
> Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB
> Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 �RNSK�LDSVIK, Sweden
> Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05
> Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com
>
> "Senex semper diu dormit"
>
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
