Well guys,

Give you example how simple you can use back Ice Defender Server version.
First of all just type netstat -an in dos command prompt and you get all the
port listening and by using fport you know which port is which services.
such as below:

Pid   Process            Port  Proto Path
416   svchost        ->  135   TCP   C:\WINNT\system32\svchost.exe
8     System         ->  139   TCP
644   javaw          ->  777   TCP   C:\Program
Files\JavaSoft\JRE\1.3.1\bin\ja
aw.exe
892   MSTask         ->  1026  TCP   C:\WINNT\system32\MSTask.exe
8     System         ->  1028  TCP
516   svchost        ->  3002  TCP   C:\WINNT\System32\svchost.exe
516   svchost        ->  3003  TCP   C:\WINNT\System32\svchost.exe
516   svchost        ->  3004  TCP   C:\WINNT\System32\svchost.exe
1260  alertsvc       ->  3005  TCP   C:\PROGRA~1\Navnt\alertsvc.exe
580   mysqld-nt      ->  3306  TCP   C:\nsh\mysql\bin\mysqld-nt.exe
860   RSCD           ->  4750  TCP   C:\rsc\RSCD.exe
1612  msmsgs         ->  9637  TCP   C:\Program Files\Messenger\msmsgs.exe
516   svchost        ->  53    UDP   C:\WINNT\System32\svchost.exe
416   svchost        ->  135   UDP   C:\WINNT\system32\svchost.exe
8     System         ->  137   UDP
8     System         ->  138   UDP
248   lsass          ->  500   UDP   C:\WINNT\system32\lsass.exe
472   AuditService   ->  1025  UDP   C:\Program
Files\BackLog\AuditService.EXE
236   services       ->  1027  UDP   C:\WINNT\system32\services.exe
516   svchost        ->  3001  UDP   C:\WINNT\System32\svchost.exe
1260  alertsvc       ->  3006  UDP   C:\PROGRA~1\Navnt\alertsvc.exe

Compare it to know which service relate to which port and put that thing in
black ice server version firewall setting. Simple.

Be more cost effective, we have been running Black Ice for 4 years. No
problem at tghe moment. It has the capability of block other thing as well.

Sincerely

Mustapa Khan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mikael Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mustapa Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "jacqueline hoe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: cyberwall Plus/Host based Firewall


>
>
> Mustapa Khan wrote:
> >
> > [black ice defender...] is so cost effective and if anyone tell
> > you that it is not good at all, 47 servers in our data center in
> > Singapore and Malaysia is using that at the moment.
>
> Uh, wait. Notepad is also cost effective. All of our NT servers
> have it. When did this ever become a valid argument in and of itself
> in a security-related debate?
>
> (Note that I'm NOT saying "Black Ice Defender sucks". I don't know
> enough about it to say that, or the opposite, for that matter. I'm
> just saying that this argument alone is worth _very_ little to me.)
>
> Regards,
> /Mikael Olsson
>
> --
> Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB
> Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 �RNSK�LDSVIK, Sweden
> Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00   Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05
> Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50       WWW: http://www.clavister.com
>
> "Senex semper diu dormit"
> _______________________________________________
> Firewalls mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go
to:
> http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
>
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to:
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls

Reply via email to