This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 2/21/00 12:07:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

Hi Mike,

<< >The preformance capabilities is an established
 >fact, and do not need to be drilled into the ground.  It is the
 >appearance/conformation issue, the tendency to think "sport" versus "draft"
 >which should be explored further.
 
 I disagree.  I don't think you should think sport/draft at all.  Think 
 FJORD HORSE. >>

Again, great post!  I agree with you 100%, BUT, people DO think "sport" 
versus "draft".  Nine times out of ten, one of the first questions we are 
asked by a potential buyer is if we have "sport" or "draft" Norwegian Fjords. 
 Are we, the Norwegian Fjord people, putting this misconception out to the 
general public, ourselves?  That is worrisome...

<Then maybe the white line analogy is flawed.  Don't try to find that "Ideal 
Fjord" on the line and think that it is the only one that is any 
good.  That "Ideal" is different things to different people. >

Could this not apply to evaluators, themselves?   If so, how does that affect 
the future of the Norwegian Fjord?

I have to agree with Catherine, we also have a broad range of sizes on our 
farm, and love each and every one of them.  They are ALL Norwegian Fjords.

Sincerely,

Lynda and Daniel
Bailey's Norwegian Fjord Horse Farm
White Cloud, MI
http://hometown.aol.com/heithingi/BaileysNorwegianFjords.html

Reply via email to