I've decided to put that one off till after the release. btw the cvs logs show that change happened between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3, or do you mean the warnings will come from the extra -W options you proposed?
--- Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josh Coalson wrote: > > > checked in to CVS is what will be very close to the 1.2.1 release > > of flac scheduled for monday. if anyone can try building it and > > even better running the test suite, and reporting back any > problems, > > that will help me get things in better shape. > > I'm currently running the tests on : > > Linux x86-64 > Mac OSX PowerPC > > Do you plan to revert the changes you made to the function > prototypes: > > FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_mime_type > FLAC__metadata_object_picture_set_description > > in include/FLAC/metadata.h? Like I stated in a previous email: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2007-September/002351.html > > If you allow this changes to stay, it will mean that client code > that compiled with no warnings with FLAC 1.2.0 will produce > warnings with 1.2.1. > > > Erik ____________________________________________________________________________________ Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
