2015-04-19 22:36 GMT+02:00 lvqcl <lvqcl.m...@gmail.com>: > So the question is: why the condition in evaluate_lpc_subframe_() wasn't > changed in this commit. > Maybe there were some reasons, but maybe Josh forgot about it. >
Or maybe the question is: why is this code in evaluate_lpc_subframe anyway, i.e, why is this code duplicated? If process_subframe_ sets the qlp_precision for evaluate_lpc_subframe, why should the latter ignore that? We can only speculate about this, but I think this code has been duplicated by accident, and therefore it wasn't changed as the code shouldn't have been there in the first place. P.S.: sorry for the duplicate lvqcl
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
