Jason, as this is your second direct rebuff of the Fuse Kit,
it seems you may have other reasons for not promoting it.
Is it out of the scope of this list to wonder why?
30k?
I understand the problem if you're engineering web based
apps, not including overextended RAI's which are much different.
it seems one Man's performance is another's, well - performance.
30k is large but not so unreasonable for smooth animation which
brings web environments closer to real life, aka video, aka motion
graphics, aka sales.
On Dec 15, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Merrill, Jason wrote:
1. Fuse -- From what I have gathered, this is great for big
projects, but not so much for the small things.
But not really big projects, or projects that already have a lot of
overhead in the CPU already. I have found the performance of Fuse
to be
less than satisfactory in stressful situations. This is my personal
experience only. Open up a .swf that uses Fuse with a .swf decompiler
and you'll see how much extra code you're adding to your projects.
Using the Fuse classes, (unless you selectively import only the
ones you
need - if you are savy enough to figure that out), will add 30k to
your
Flash file and almost 4,000 lines of code.
Jason Merrill
Bank of America
Learning & Organizational Effectiveness
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
