I wasnt actually the original question-asker, but thanks :) I was just curious about the actual performance hit from getChild.
.m On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Taka Kojima <t...@gigafied.com> wrote: > I use the method I gave you earlier, adding elements to an array and > accessing them that way. > > Also, you can use getChildAt() if you know the index of the children, which > it sounds like you do if you have them named as you do... i.e. column1, > column2, column3 > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Matt S. <mattsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So as a general question, what is the preferred method if you're >> trying to get, say, dynamically generated children, eg >> "image1"...."image20" etc, from a container? >> >> .m >> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Ian Thomas <i...@eirias.net> wrote: >> > Yes. >> >> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Anthony Pace <anthony.p...@utoronto.ca> >> wrote: >> >> isn't getting a child by name very slow? >> _______________________________________________ >> Flashcoders mailing list >> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders >> > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
