I use: http://browsershots.org/

To quickly check rendering in different browsers.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:39 AM, jonathan howe <jonathangh...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Regarding being able to test in older versions of IE (since you can't run
> parallel versions).
> I used this program for a little while:
> http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage
> I think they actually use the real rendering engine via OLE but it has its
> flaws as well.
> It's been a year or so since I've done that kind of work and thus since
> I've
> used the product but give it a shot.
>
> Looks like they included IE8 beta 2..
>
> -jonathan
>
>
> P.S. My gmail client is broken in IE8 beta as I type this, so if it's bad
> enough for Google, it's bad enough for your client! (Oh, wait, Gmail claims
> it's still in beta itself)
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Vayu Robins <v...@vayu.dk> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for all the good feedback on this! :-)
> >
> >
> > On 2/3/09 8:25 PM, "John Dowdell" <jdowd...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Vayu Robins wrote, when finding that an existing HTML site was reported
> > > to not render correctly in this week's IE8 release candidate:
> > >> Does anybody have any comments on this? Should I download the IE8
> > version
> > >> and find the problem?  I am on a mac, using Parallels Desktop, Windows
> > XP.
> > >
> > > I've heard other reports of newer HTML clients not supporting existing
> > > websites, but I haven't tracked the pre-release details. Best resource
> I
> > > know of for user-experience changes is the IE team's own weblog:
> > > http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/
> > >
> > > That said, it may be a client/developer contractual agreement about
> > > which browsers to test against. If they specified IE6 and IE7 for the
> > > Microsoft-branded browsers, then it doesn't seem quite fair to suddenly
> > > add another version (particularly a pre-release) to that matrix. But if
> > > the required clientside runtimes were not specified in the original
> > > contract, then that could make things stickier... it sounds like they
> > > accepted the project, then wanted to make changes after the project was
> > > "finished". Tricky problem!  :(
> > >
> > > jd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > Flashcoders mailing list
> > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -jonathan howe
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>



-- 

Cheers,
Nate
----------------------------------------
http://blog.natebeck.net
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to