I use: http://browsershots.org/
To quickly check rendering in different browsers. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:39 AM, jonathan howe <jonathangh...@gmail.com>wrote: > Regarding being able to test in older versions of IE (since you can't run > parallel versions). > I used this program for a little while: > http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage > I think they actually use the real rendering engine via OLE but it has its > flaws as well. > It's been a year or so since I've done that kind of work and thus since > I've > used the product but give it a shot. > > Looks like they included IE8 beta 2.. > > -jonathan > > > P.S. My gmail client is broken in IE8 beta as I type this, so if it's bad > enough for Google, it's bad enough for your client! (Oh, wait, Gmail claims > it's still in beta itself) > > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Vayu Robins <v...@vayu.dk> wrote: > > > Thanks for all the good feedback on this! :-) > > > > > > On 2/3/09 8:25 PM, "John Dowdell" <jdowd...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > Vayu Robins wrote, when finding that an existing HTML site was reported > > > to not render correctly in this week's IE8 release candidate: > > >> Does anybody have any comments on this? Should I download the IE8 > > version > > >> and find the problem? I am on a mac, using Parallels Desktop, Windows > > XP. > > > > > > I've heard other reports of newer HTML clients not supporting existing > > > websites, but I haven't tracked the pre-release details. Best resource > I > > > know of for user-experience changes is the IE team's own weblog: > > > http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/ > > > > > > That said, it may be a client/developer contractual agreement about > > > which browsers to test against. If they specified IE6 and IE7 for the > > > Microsoft-branded browsers, then it doesn't seem quite fair to suddenly > > > add another version (particularly a pre-release) to that matrix. But if > > > the required clientside runtimes were not specified in the original > > > contract, then that could make things stickier... it sounds like they > > > accepted the project, then wanted to make changes after the project was > > > "finished". Tricky problem! :( > > > > > > jd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > > -- > -jonathan howe > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > -- Cheers, Nate ---------------------------------------- http://blog.natebeck.net _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders