On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:13:56 +0100
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> > + nph = buf[2];
> > + msg_cdbg2("SFDP number of parameter headers (NPH) = %d (+ 1 mandatory)"
> > + "\n", nph);
> > +
> > + /* Fetch all parameter headers, even if we don't use them all (yet). */
> > + hbuf = malloc(sizeof(struct sfdp_tbl_hdr) * (nph + 1));
> > + hdrs = malloc((nph + 1) * 8);
>
> Why is 8 a magic unexplained constant for hdrs allocation, but sizeof
> struct sfdp_tbl_hdr (which is 8 as well) is used for hbuf allocation?
> Did you mix up the two by accident?
ooops. actually it should be the other way around.
rationale: we know exactly how big hbuf should be. it is filled by
spi_sfdp_read and read by index. actually we would only need 7 bytes
because the last byte of each header is unused, but this would
complicate the call(s) to spi_sfdp_read.
hdrs OTOH is accessed by the struct members only and we dont know the
size of the struct beforehand.
> And why is (nph+1) the first factor
> in the second malloc and the second factor in the first malloc?
just to test the reviewer of course.
> > + tbuf = malloc(len);
> > + if (tbuf == NULL) {
> > + msg_gerr("Out of memory!\n");
>
> insert the following code:
> ret = 0;
^ this is not needed because ret is only changed in the loop later.
i have now refined the whole error handling inside the loop anyway, see
end of mail.
> goto cleanup_hdrs;
>
> > + exit(1); /* FIXME: shutdown gracefully */
>
> and kill the exit(1). It would be nice to change the probe interface to
> return 0 on success... that would allow us to return detailed errors.
> OTOH, we might want to use the probe interface to return match accuracy,
> in which case 0 would be nomatch. Comments appreciated.
the only thing i can think about at the moment regarding this: this
thread is already complicated enough :)
we could do both... returning a struct is always an option, if it is
really needed.
is the accuracy really needed? the only use of it would be to order the
matches for the user, or define limits of "accuracy amount" where we
decide on our own...? i think we have more important problems to solve,
but if you want to discuss this further, please start another RFC
thread with more details.
> > + }
> > + if (sfdp_fetch_pt(flash, tmp32, tbuf, len)){
> > + msg_cerr("Fetching SFDP parameter table %d failed.\n",
> > + i);
> > + free(tbuf);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + if (i == 0) { /* Mandatory JEDEC SFDP parameter table */
> > + if (hdrs[i].id != 0)
> > + msg_cdbg("ID of the mandatory JEDEC SFDP "
>
> msg_cerr, then cleanup and return 0. Maybe even ask user to report?
the question is if this would ever safe anyone from bricking something.
if not, it is much better to ignore it due to how well *cough* vendors
have implemented the standard so far (david's winbond chip works
flawlessly but has the ID set to 0xe5 - does that ring a bell btw?).
we only have the two samples from winbond and macronix, but it is
quite evident that vendors rather understood "first table is the jedec
flash parameter table" than the scheme of parameter table IDs.
At this point i think it might even be a good idea to introduce a
"yes_i_have_verified_the_SFDP_parameters_to_be_reasonable" option. No
ID check (especially not against 0) will make the whole thing much
safer imo.
> > +
> > + if (len != 9 * 4 && len != 4 * 4) {
> > + msg_cdbg("Length of the mandatory JEDEC SFDP "
>
> msg_cerr, then cleanup and return 0. Maybe even ask user to report?
see end of mail
> > + "parameter table is %d B instead of "
> > + "36 B (i.e. 9 double words) as "
> > + "demanded by JESD216, skipping "
> > + "parsing.\n", len);
> > + } else if (sfdp_fill_flash(flash, tbuf, len) == 0)
> > + ret = 1;
the main idea of the loop is to iterate over the various sfdp parameter
headers and contents. while doing that we want to extract and print any
information we can derive from it and eventually use it to fill a
struct flash. the error handling now guarantees that we will look at
all tables except in the case of OOM. since the tables are all
independent in theory we should not abort the probing by enforcing ret
= 0 if other tables are bogus or we cant retrieve them. this also
allows us to dump as much information as possible without adding other
code (i have done that previously to debug the macronix chips and it was
awful.
attached patch is untested. i will do that tomorrow, but wanted to give
you the chance to reply early.
one thing i remember to be missing is the 4k handling. apart from that
and the loop error handling i hope we are quite finished. \o/
--
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
>From 7da7bc44beea49697cb4983d4815b1ba2fb6e937 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:47:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for SFDP (JESD216).
Similar to modules using the opaque programmer framework (e.g. ICH Hardware
Sequencing) this uses a template struct flashchip element in flashchips.c with
a special probe function that fills the obtained values into that struct.
This allows yet unknown SPI chips to be supported (read, erase, write) almost
as if it was already added to flashchips.c.
Documentation used:
http://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/jesd216 (2011-04)
W25Q32BV data sheet Revision F (2011-04-01)
EN25QH16 data sheet Revision F (2011-06-01)
todo:
- handle programmers which have a problem with the dummy bytes needed
- move sfdp_add_uniform_eraser to spi25.c for further use like
spi_get_erasefn_from_opcode?
- is setting the generic SPI unlock method safe?
- what page_size should be set?
Tested-by: David Hendricks <[email protected]>
on W25Q64CV
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>
---
Makefile | 2 +-
chipdrivers.h | 4 +
flash.h | 2 +
flashchips.c | 23 ++++
flashchips.h | 10 +-
flashrom.c | 37 +++++-
sfdp.c | 359 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
spi.h | 5 +
spi25.c | 31 +++++
9 files changed, 461 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 sfdp.c
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 83aa038..b890d8a 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ endif
CHIP_OBJS = jedec.o stm50flw0x0x.o w39.o w29ee011.o \
sst28sf040.o m29f400bt.o 82802ab.o pm49fl00x.o \
sst49lfxxxc.o sst_fwhub.o flashchips.o spi.o spi25.o sharplhf00l04.o \
- a25.o at25.o opaque.o
+ a25.o at25.o opaque.o sfdp.o
LIB_OBJS = layout.o
diff --git a/chipdrivers.h b/chipdrivers.h
index a1d0cd9..bd81098 100644
--- a/chipdrivers.h
+++ b/chipdrivers.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ int spi_block_erase_d7(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int b
int spi_block_erase_d8(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen);
int spi_block_erase_60(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen);
int spi_block_erase_c7(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen);
+erasefunc_t *spi_get_erasefn_from_opcode(uint8_t opcode);
int spi_chip_write_1(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len);
int spi_chip_write_256(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len);
int spi_chip_read(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, int unsigned len);
@@ -58,6 +59,9 @@ int spi_read_chunked(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, u
int spi_write_chunked(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len, unsigned int chunksize);
int spi_aai_write(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len);
+/* sfdp.c */
+int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash);
+
/* opaque.c */
int probe_opaque(struct flashctx *flash);
int read_opaque(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, unsigned int len);
diff --git a/flash.h b/flash.h
index e51b6d4..6bcae71 100644
--- a/flash.h
+++ b/flash.h
@@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ struct flashctx {
struct registered_programmer *pgm;
};
+typedef int (erasefunc_t)(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr, unsigned int blocklen);
+
#define TEST_UNTESTED 0
#define TEST_OK_PROBE (1 << 0)
diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c
index ca1c57f..100fc6a 100644
--- a/flashchips.c
+++ b/flashchips.c
@@ -8872,6 +8872,29 @@ const struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
.read = read_memmapped,
.voltage = {3000, 3600}, /* Also has 12V fast program */
},
+
+ {
+ .vendor = "Unknown",
+ .name = "SFDP device",
+ .bustype = BUS_SPI,
+ .manufacture_id = GENERIC_MANUF_ID,
+ .model_id = SFDP_DEVICE_ID,
+ /* We present our own "report this" text hence we do not
+ * want the default "This flash part has status UNTESTED..."
+ * text to be printed. */
+ .tested = TEST_OK_PREW,
+ .probe = probe_spi_sfdp,
+ .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect, /* is this safe? */
+ .read = spi_chip_read,
+ /* FIXME: some vendor extensions define this */
+ .voltage = {},
+ /* Everything below will be set by the probing function. */
+ .write = NULL,
+ .total_size = 0,
+ .page_size = 0,
+ .feature_bits = 0,
+ .block_erasers = {},
+ },
{
.vendor = "Programmer",
diff --git a/flashchips.h b/flashchips.h
index 03efb86..e5eca6d 100644
--- a/flashchips.h
+++ b/flashchips.h
@@ -34,8 +34,11 @@
* SPI parts have 16-bit device IDs if they support RDID.
*/
-#define GENERIC_MANUF_ID 0xffff /* Check if there is a vendor ID */
-#define GENERIC_DEVICE_ID 0xffff /* Only match the vendor ID */
+#define GENERIC_MANUF_ID 0xFFFF /* Check if there is a vendor ID */
+#define GENERIC_DEVICE_ID 0xFFFF /* Only match the vendor ID */
+#define SFDP_DEVICE_ID 0xFFFE
+#define PROGMANUF_ID 0xFFFE /* dummy ID for opaque chips behind a programmer */
+#define PROGDEV_ID 0x01 /* dummy ID for opaque chips behind a programmer */
#define ALLIANCE_ID 0x52 /* Alliance Semiconductor */
#define ALLIANCE_AS29F002B 0x34
@@ -646,7 +649,4 @@
#define WINBOND_W49V002A 0xB0
#define WINBOND_W49V002FA 0x32
-#define PROGMANUF_ID 0xFFFE /* dummy ID for opaque chips behind a programmer */
-#define PROGDEV_ID 0x01 /* dummy ID for opaque chips behind a programmer */
-
#endif /* !FLASHCHIPS_H */
diff --git a/flashrom.c b/flashrom.c
index ee68344..1cfd846 100644
--- a/flashrom.c
+++ b/flashrom.c
@@ -980,13 +980,38 @@ int probe_flash(struct registered_programmer *pgm, int startchip,
/* If this is the first chip found, accept it.
* If this is not the first chip found, accept it only if it is
- * a non-generic match.
- * We could either make chipcount global or provide it as
- * parameter, or we assume that startchip==0 means this call to
- * probe_flash() is the first one and thus no chip has been
- * found before.
+ * a non-generic match. SFDP and CFI are generic matches.
+ * startchip==0 means this call to probe_flash() is the first
+ * one for this programmer interface and thus no other chip has
+ * been found on this interface.
*/
- if (startchip == 0 || fill_flash->model_id != GENERIC_DEVICE_ID)
+ if (startchip == 0 && fill_flash->model_id == SFDP_DEVICE_ID) {
+ msg_cinfo("===\n"
+ "SFDP has autodetected a flash chip which is "
+ "not natively supported by flashrom yet.\n");
+ if (count_usable_erasers(fill_flash) == 0)
+ msg_cinfo("The standard operations read and "
+ "verify should work, but to support "
+ "erase, write and all other "
+ "possible features");
+ else
+ msg_cinfo("All standard operations (read, "
+ "verify, erase and write) should "
+ "work, but to support all possible "
+ "features");
+
+ msg_cinfo(" we need to add them manually.\nYou "
+ "can help us by mailing us the output of "
+ "the following command to flashrom@flashrom."
+ "org: \n'flashrom -VV [plus the "
+ "-p/--programmer parameter (if needed)]"
+ "'\nThanks for your help!\n"
+ "===\n");
+ }
+
+ if (startchip == 0 ||
+ ((fill_flash->model_id != GENERIC_DEVICE_ID) &&
+ (fill_flash->model_id != SFDP_DEVICE_ID)))
break;
notfound:
diff --git a/sfdp.c b/sfdp.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d028de1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sfdp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
+/*
+ * This file is part of the flashrom project.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Stefan Tauner
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+ */
+
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "flash.h"
+#include "spi.h"
+#include "chipdrivers.h"
+
+static int spi_sfdp_wrapper(struct flashctx *flash, uint32_t address, uint8_t *buf, int len)
+{
+ int i, ret;
+ const unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_SFDP_OUTSIZE] = {
+ JEDEC_SFDP,
+ (address >> 16) & 0xff,
+ (address >> 8) & 0xff,
+ (address >> 0) & 0xff,
+ /* FIXME: the following dummy byte explodes on some programmers.
+ * One possible workaround would be to read the dummy byte
+ * instead and discard its value.
+ */
+ 0
+ };
+ msg_cspew("spi_sfdp_wrapper: addr=0x%x, len=%d, data:\n", address, len);
+ ret = spi_send_command(flash, sizeof(cmd), len, cmd, buf);
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+ msg_cspew(" 0x%02x", buf[i]);
+ msg_cspew("\n");
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int spi_sfdp_read(struct flashctx *flash, uint32_t address, uint8_t *buf, int len)
+{
+ /* FIXME: this is wrong. There are different upper bounds for the number
+ * of bytes to read on the various programmers (even depending on the
+ * rest of the structure of the transaction).*/
+ int maxstep = 8;
+ int ret = 0;
+ while (len > 0) {
+ int step = min(len, maxstep);
+ ret = spi_sfdp_wrapper(flash, address, buf, step);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ address += step;
+ buf += step;
+ len -= step;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct sfdp_tbl_hdr {
+ uint8_t id;
+ uint8_t v_minor;
+ uint8_t v_major;
+ uint8_t len;
+ uint32_t ptp; /* 24b pointer */
+};
+
+static int sfdp_add_uniform_eraser(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t opcode, uint32_t blocksize)
+{
+ uint32_t total_size = flash->total_size * 1024;
+ int i;
+ erasefunc_t *erasefn = spi_get_erasefn_from_opcode(opcode);
+ if (erasefn == NULL)
+ return 1;
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS; i++) {
+ struct block_eraser *eraser = &flash->block_erasers[i];
+ if (eraser->eraseblocks[0].size != 0 || !eraser->block_erase)
+ continue;
+ eraser->block_erase = erasefn;
+ eraser->eraseblocks[0].size = blocksize;
+ eraser->eraseblocks[0].count = total_size/blocksize;
+ msg_cdbg2(" Block eraser %d: %d x %d B with opcode "
+ "0x%02x\n", i, total_size/blocksize, blocksize,
+ opcode);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ msg_cinfo("%s: Not enough space to store another eraser (i=%d)."
+ " Please report this at [email protected]\n",
+ __func__, i);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static int sfdp_fill_flash(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, uint16_t len)
+{
+ uint32_t tmp32;
+ uint8_t tmp8;
+ uint32_t total_size; /* in bytes */
+ uint32_t blocksize;
+ uint8_t opcode_4k = 0xFF;
+ int dw, j;
+
+ msg_cdbg("Parsing JEDEC flash parameter table... ");
+ if (len != 9 * 4 && len != 4 * 4) {
+ msg_cerr("%s: len out of spec\n", __func__);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ msg_cdbg2("\n");
+
+ /* 1. double word */
+ dw = 0;
+ tmp32 = buf[(4 * dw) + 0];
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[(4 * dw) + 1]) << 8;
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[(4 * dw) + 2]) << 16;
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[(4 * dw) + 3]) << 24;
+
+ tmp8 = (tmp32 >> 17) & 0x3;
+ switch (tmp8) {
+ case 0x0:
+ msg_cdbg2(" 3-Byte only addressing.\n");
+ break;
+ case 0x1:
+ msg_cdbg2(" 3-Byte (and optionally 4-Byte) addressing.\n");
+ break;
+ case 0x2:
+ msg_cdbg(" 4-Byte only addressing not supported.\n");
+ return 1;
+ default:
+ msg_cdbg(" Required addressing mode (0x%x) not supported.\n",
+ tmp8);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ msg_cdbg2(" Status register is ");
+ if (tmp32 & (1 << 3)) {
+ msg_cdbg2("volatile and writes to the status register have to "
+ "be enabled with ");
+ if (tmp32 & (1 << 4)) {
+ flash->feature_bits = FEATURE_WRSR_WREN;
+ msg_cdbg2("WREN (0x06).\n");
+ } else {
+ flash->feature_bits = FEATURE_WRSR_EWSR;
+ msg_cdbg2("EWSR (0x50).\n");
+ }
+ } else
+ msg_cdbg2("non-volatile and the standard does not allow "
+ "vendors to tell us whether EWSR/WREN is needed for "
+ "status register writes - assuming EWSR.\n");
+
+ msg_cdbg2(" Write chunk size is ");
+ if (tmp32 & (1 << 2)) {
+ msg_cdbg2("at least 64 B.\n");
+ flash->page_size = 64;
+ flash->write = spi_chip_write_256;
+ } else {
+ msg_cdbg2("1 B only.\n");
+ flash->page_size = 256;
+ flash->write = spi_chip_write_1;
+ }
+
+ if ((tmp32 & 0x3) == 0x1) {
+ opcode_4k = (tmp32 >> 8) & 0xFF; /* will be dealt with later */
+ }
+
+ /* 2. double word */
+ dw = 1;
+ tmp32 = buf[(4 * dw) + 0];
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[(4 * dw) + 1]) << 8;
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[(4 * dw) + 2]) << 16;
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[(4 * dw) + 3]) << 24;
+
+ if (tmp32 & (1 << 31)) {
+ msg_cerr("Flash chip size >= 4 Gb/512 MB not supported.\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+ total_size = ((tmp32 & 0x7FFFFFFF) + 1) / 8;
+ flash->total_size = total_size / 1024;
+ msg_cdbg2(" Flash chip size is %d kB.\n", flash->total_size);
+
+ /* FIXME: double words 3-7 contain unused fast read information */
+
+ if (len == 4 * 4) {
+ msg_cdbg("It seems like this chip supports the preliminary "
+ "Intel version of SFDP, skipping processing of double "
+ "words 3-9.\n");
+ goto proc_4k;
+ }
+
+ dw = 8;
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
+ /* 8 double words from the start + 2 words for every eraser */
+ tmp8 = buf[(4 * dw) + (2 * j)];
+ if (tmp8 == 0) {
+ msg_cdbg2(" Block eraser %d is unused.\n", j);
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (tmp8 >= 31) {
+ msg_cdbg2(" Block size of eraser %d (2^%d) is too big "
+ "for flashrom.\n", j, tmp8);
+ continue;
+ }
+ blocksize = 1 << (tmp8); /* blocksize = 2 ^ field */
+
+ tmp8 = buf[(4 * dw) + (2 * j) + 1];
+ if (sfdp_add_uniform_eraser(flash, tmp8, blocksize))
+ continue;
+ /* If there is a valid 4k value in the last double words,
+ * we want to override the value from double word 1, hence force
+ * skipping its processing: */
+ if (blocksize == 4 * 1024 && tmp8 == opcode_4k)
+ opcode_4k = 0xFF;
+ }
+
+proc_4k:
+ if (opcode_4k != 0xFF) {
+ sfdp_add_uniform_eraser(flash, opcode_4k, 4 * 1024);
+ }
+ msg_cdbg("done.\n");
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ uint8_t buf[8];
+ uint32_t tmp32;
+ uint8_t nph;
+ /* need to limit the table loop by comparing i to uint8_t nph hence: */
+ uint16_t i;
+ struct sfdp_tbl_hdr *hdrs;
+ uint8_t *hbuf;
+ uint8_t *tbuf;
+
+ if (spi_sfdp_read(flash, 0x00, buf, 4)) {
+ msg_cdbg("Receiving SFDP signature failed.\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+ tmp32 = buf[0];
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[1]) << 8;
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[2]) << 16;
+ tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[3]) << 24;
+
+ if (tmp32 != 0x50444653) {
+ msg_cdbg2("Signature = 0x%08x (should be 0x50444653)\n", tmp32);
+ msg_cdbg("No SFDP signature found.\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (spi_sfdp_read(flash, 0x04, buf, 3)) {
+ msg_cerr("Receiving SFDP revision and number of parameter "
+ "headers (NPH) failed. ");
+ return 0;
+ }
+ msg_cdbg2("SFDP revision = %d.%d\n", buf[1], buf[0]);
+ if (buf[1] != 0x01) {
+ msg_cinfo("The chip supports an unkown version of SFDP. "
+ "Aborting SFDP probe!\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+ nph = buf[2];
+ msg_cdbg2("SFDP number of parameter headers (NPH) = %d (+ 1 mandatory)"
+ "\n", nph);
+
+ /* Fetch all parameter headers, even if we don't use them all (yet). */
+ hbuf = malloc((nph + 1) * 8);
+ hdrs = malloc((nph + 1) * sizeof(struct sfdp_tbl_hdr));
+ if (hbuf == NULL || hdrs == NULL ) {
+ msg_gerr("Out of memory!\n");
+ goto cleanup_hdrs;
+ }
+ if (spi_sfdp_read(flash, 0x08, hbuf, (nph + 1) * 8)) {
+ msg_cerr("Receiving SFDP parameter table headers failed.\n");
+ goto cleanup_hdrs;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i <= nph; i++) {
+ uint16_t len;
+ hdrs[i].id = hbuf[(8 * i) + 0];
+ hdrs[i].v_minor = hbuf[(8 * i) + 1];
+ hdrs[i].v_major = hbuf[(8 * i) + 2];
+ hdrs[i].len = hbuf[(8 * i) + 3];
+ hdrs[i].ptp = hbuf[(8 * i) + 4];
+ hdrs[i].ptp |= ((unsigned int)hbuf[(8 * i) + 5]) << 8;
+ hdrs[i].ptp |= ((unsigned int)hbuf[(8 * i) + 6]) << 16;
+ msg_cdbg2("SFDP parameter table header %d/%d:\n", i, nph);
+ msg_cdbg2(" ID 0x%02x, version %d.%d\n", hdrs[i].id,
+ hdrs[i].v_major, hdrs[i].v_minor);
+ len = hdrs[i].len * 4;
+ tmp32 = hdrs[i].ptp;
+ msg_cdbg2(" Length %d B, Parameter Table Pointer 0x%06x\n",
+ len, tmp32);
+
+ if (len + tmp32 > UINT16_MAX) {
+ msg_cerr("SFDP Parameter Table %d supposedly overflows "
+ "addressable SFDP area. This most\n probably "
+ "indicates a corrupt SFDP parameter table "
+ "header. Skipping it.\n", i);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ tbuf = malloc(len);
+ if (tbuf == NULL) {
+ msg_gerr("Out of memory!\n");
+ goto cleanup_hdrs;
+ }
+ if (spi_sfdp_read(flash, tmp32, tbuf, len)){
+ msg_cinfo("Fetching SFDP parameter table %d failed.\n",
+ i);
+ free(tbuf);
+ continue;
+ }
+ msg_cspew(" Parameter table contents:\n");
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ if ((i % 8) == 0) {
+ msg_cspew(" 0x%04x: ", i);
+ }
+ msg_cspew(" %02x", buf[i]);
+ if ((i % 8) == 7) {
+ msg_cspew("\n");
+ continue;
+ }
+ if ((i % 8) == 3) {
+ msg_cspew(" ");
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+ msg_cspew("\n");
+
+ if (i == 0) { /* Mandatory JEDEC SFDP parameter table */
+ if (hdrs[i].id != 0)
+ msg_cdbg("ID of the mandatory JEDEC SFDP "
+ "parameter table is not 0 as demanded "
+ "by JESD216 (warning only).\n");
+
+ if (hdrs[i].v_major != 0x01) {
+ msg_cinfo("The chip contains an unkown version "
+ "of the JEDEC flash parameters "
+ "table, skipping parsing.\n");
+ } else if (len != 9 * 4 && len != 4 * 4) {
+ msg_cdbg("Length of the mandatory JEDEC SFDP "
+ "parameter table is wrong (%d B), "
+ "skipping its parsing.\n", len);
+ } else if (sfdp_fill_flash(flash, tbuf, len) == 0)
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ free(tbuf);
+ }
+
+cleanup_hdrs:
+ free(hdrs);
+ free(hbuf);
+ return ret;
+}
diff --git a/spi.h b/spi.h
index b908603..5f07eae 100644
--- a/spi.h
+++ b/spi.h
@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@
#define JEDEC_REMS_OUTSIZE 0x04
#define JEDEC_REMS_INSIZE 0x02
+/* Read Serial Flash Discoverable Parameters (SFDP) */
+#define JEDEC_SFDP 0x5a
+#define JEDEC_SFDP_OUTSIZE 0x05 /* 8b op, 24b addr, 8b dummy */
+/* JEDEC_SFDP_INSIZE : any length */
+
/* Read Electronic Signature */
#define JEDEC_RES 0xab
#define JEDEC_RES_OUTSIZE 0x04
diff --git a/spi25.c b/spi25.c
index 3ce7f08..5c83725 100644
--- a/spi25.c
+++ b/spi25.c
@@ -720,6 +720,37 @@ int spi_block_erase_c7(struct flashctx *flash, unsigned int addr,
return spi_chip_erase_c7(flash);
}
+erasefunc_t *spi_get_erasefn_from_opcode(uint8_t opcode)
+{
+ switch(opcode){
+ case 0xff:
+ case 0x00:
+ /* Not specified, assuming "not supported". */
+ return NULL;
+ case 0x20:
+ return &spi_block_erase_20;
+ break;
+ case 0x52:
+ return &spi_block_erase_52;
+ break;
+ case 0x60:
+ return &spi_block_erase_60;
+ break;
+ case 0xc7:
+ return &spi_block_erase_c7;
+ break;
+ case 0xd7:
+ return &spi_block_erase_d7;
+ break;
+ case 0xd8:
+ return &spi_block_erase_d8;
+ default:
+ msg_cinfo("%s: unknown erase opcode (0x%02x). Please report "
+ "this at [email protected]\n", __func__, opcode);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+}
+
int spi_write_status_enable(struct flashctx *flash)
{
static const unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_EWSR_OUTSIZE] = { JEDEC_EWSR };
--
1.7.1
_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
