Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>
---
we were wrong regarding the probing process... the generic probes are
executed apparently. this patch degrades all failure outputs (but OOM)
to dbg.
sfdp.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sfdp.c b/sfdp.c
index 6a76994..75dfb5f 100644
--- a/sfdp.c
+++ b/sfdp.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int sfdp_fill_flash(struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t
*buf, uint16_t len)
msg_cdbg("Parsing JEDEC flash parameter table... ");
if (len != 9 * 4 && len != 4 * 4) {
- msg_cerr("%s: len out of spec\n", __func__);
+ msg_cdbg("%s: len out of spec\n", __func__);
return 1;
}
msg_cdbg2("\n");
@@ -144,11 +144,11 @@ static int sfdp_fill_flash(struct flashctx *flash,
uint8_t *buf, uint16_t len)
msg_cdbg2(" 3-Byte (and optionally 4-Byte) addressing.\n");
break;
case 0x2:
- msg_cerr(" 4-Byte only addressing (not supported by "
+ msg_cdbg(" 4-Byte only addressing (not supported by "
"flashrom).\n");
return 1;
default:
- msg_cerr(" Required addressing mode (0x%x) not supported.\n",
+ msg_cdbg(" Required addressing mode (0x%x) not supported.\n",
tmp8);
return 1;
}
@@ -192,14 +192,14 @@ static int sfdp_fill_flash(struct flashctx *flash,
uint8_t *buf, uint16_t len)
tmp32 |= ((unsigned int)buf[(4 * dw) + 3]) << 24;
if (tmp32 & (1 << 31)) {
- msg_cerr("Flash chip size >= 4 Gb/512 MB not supported.\n");
+ msg_cdbg("Flash chip size >= 4 Gb/512 MB not supported.\n");
return 1;
}
total_size = ((tmp32 & 0x7FFFFFFF) + 1) / 8;
flash->total_size = total_size / 1024;
msg_cdbg2(" Flash chip size is %d kB.\n", flash->total_size);
if (total_size > (1 << 24)) {
- msg_cerr("Flash chip size is bigger than what 3-Byte addressing
"
+ msg_cdbg("Flash chip size is bigger than what 3-Byte addressing
"
"can access.\n");
return 1;
}
@@ -265,13 +265,13 @@ int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash)
}
if (spi_sfdp_read_sfdp(flash, 0x04, buf, 3)) {
- msg_cerr("Receiving SFDP revision and number of parameter "
+ msg_cdbg("Receiving SFDP revision and number of parameter "
"headers (NPH) failed. ");
return 0;
}
msg_cdbg2("SFDP revision = %d.%d\n", buf[1], buf[0]);
if (buf[1] != 0x01) {
- msg_cinfo("The chip supports an unknown version of SFDP. "
+ msg_cdbg("The chip supports an unknown version of SFDP. "
"Aborting SFDP probe!\n");
return 0;
}
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash)
goto cleanup_hdrs;
}
if (spi_sfdp_read_sfdp(flash, 0x08, hbuf, (nph + 1) * 8)) {
- msg_cerr("Receiving SFDP parameter table headers failed.\n");
+ msg_cdbg("Receiving SFDP parameter table headers failed.\n");
goto cleanup_hdrs;
}
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash)
len, tmp32);
if (tmp32 + len >= (1 << 24)) {
- msg_cinfo("SFDP Parameter Table %d supposedly overflows
"
+ msg_cdbg("SFDP Parameter Table %d supposedly overflows "
"addressable SFDP area. This most\nprobably "
"indicates a corrupt SFDP parameter table "
"header. Skipping it.\n", i);
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash)
goto cleanup_hdrs;
}
if (spi_sfdp_read_sfdp(flash, tmp32, tbuf, len)){
- msg_cerr("Fetching SFDP parameter table %d failed.\n",
+ msg_cdbg("Fetching SFDP parameter table %d failed.\n",
i);
free(tbuf);
continue;
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash)
"by JESD216 (warning only).\n");
if (hdrs[i].v_major != 0x01) {
- msg_cinfo("The chip contains an unknown "
+ msg_cdbg("The chip contains an unknown "
"version of the JEDEC flash "
"parameters table, skipping it.\n");
} else if (len != 9 * 4 && len != 4 * 4) {
--
1.7.1
_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
