Thanks for that Doug. It seems like I'm not going to have any troubles, which is good to know :)
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Doug McCune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it came across clearly in Matt's interview, but I'll just > reiterate. The Flex dudes are nice and don't like being the bad guys. I've > gotten contacted by Matt before for getting into a little trouble (I posted > the Flex SDK codebase into a SVN repo before it was officially an open > source project). I think the lawyers only get involved after a few "yo, > that's not really cool" type of emails. The other thing that was mentioned > is that they've been fairly lax with "Flex" (as opposed to being hardasses > with AIR). Matt mentioned that stuff like the flex show probably falls under > the "Adobe should do something" umbrella but that they haven't pursued the > Flex stuff at all. There are a ton of examples, FlexLib, Flex Box, etc etc. > So I'd say don't use AIR cause someone seems to get all riled up when it > comes to that trademark, but I haven't seen anyone fucked with for using the > word Flex. > > And I'd also say don't look for any official adobe advice on this list > other than telling you to read the legalese. > > > > -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
