Alex Harui wrote: > Could the higher DPI just be hitting the 2880 pixel limit more easily?
i dug thru the old images w/a finer tooth comb & we have many w/300DPI 1600x1200 (from microscopes w/digital cameras lashed on top), many also had embedded thumbnails. this makes me think perhaps another bit of the process is messing up. better step back & do a fresh review of what's changed. thanks.
