I'm sure you can send XML data over CFAMFSecure. I've not done it myself but it's just text at the end of the day and you mentioned in your original post you thought it'd be a good idea using and writing XML. Iit is possible but if you prefer to use strictly typed VO's then perhaps you should avoid XML.
I'll watch this thread with interest... Nick On 3 March 2010 21:19, Laurence MacNeill <lmacne...@comcast.net> wrote: > > > I just don't see switching to XML... It's harder to maintain security and > easier to screw up the data... The beautiful thing about VOs is that you're > passing one object back and forth rather than a bunch of XML variables, and > you can do it over a CFAMFSecure channel, so you're not gonna screw it up > and it's not going to be compromised. Some of the data we're working with > must be secure... > > L. > > > > At 04:37 AM 3/3/2010, you wrote: > > > > Hi, > > An idea... You could use XML to transfer the data from Flex < -- > CF and > to create a dynamic ObjecVo in Flex you could just create and object and > just add properties to that object and assign the values. > > You could create a VO in Flex that is designed around the XML... But I > guess why would you bother with Dynamic VO's when you already the have data > in XML. > > I can't help with the CF VO side of things but can you not ditch the server > side VO's and use XML instead? > > > Nick > -- > http://blog.middleweek.co.uk > > > > > On 3 March 2010 09:35, Laurence MacNeill <lmacne...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Alternatively, there was a suggestion earlier that I use an > associative array within my VO to grab the "changed" fields. I said > that I'd never been able to get CF to return such an array, but I got > no response on that... Can anyone tell me how to get CF9 to return > an associative array within a VO? In case there's just no other way > to do it... > >
