I think you misunderstand me. I have nothing against flash sites. I'm referring to the poorly done ones where flash users were doing things merely because they now could, not because it was good design. I'm not saying anyone here falls into this category, but typically it was done by people who were solely developers and didn't have an ounce of design sense in their body, from my observations. My point is that Flex is a developer tool, and while some developers are pretty design savvy, most do not fall into that category so my fear is that if developers start using Flex to build sites, we'll be seeing a lot of sites springing up with lots of "neat" functionality with blurs and fades and slides and stuff, but zero usability and no quality user experience. Does that make more sense?

On 6/25/06, Michael Schmalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> those who decide to use Flex to do website designs rank right with those who did all that other crap in the early days of flash with bouncing balls and forced site intros and such.

I have no opinion on this subject whatsoever but..

Would like to point out that this comment is ridiculous. There have been many successful flash websites(In the right context for the right target audience), this is just plain ignorance. I guess you were one of those bouncing ball guys right?

BTW, a statement with such force doesn't require a reply but I HAD TO :)

Peace, Mike


On 6/25/06, Jignesh Dodiya < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

thanx all for reply and wish many other give their ideas on this


Regards,

Jignesh Dodiya....




--
What goes up, does come down.


__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development
Macromedia flex Software development best practice


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to